Self-Handicapping

Also known as: Self-sabotage

Self-handicapping is a cognitive strategy where individuals create obstacles to their own performance to provide a plausible excuse for potential failure, thereby protecting their self-esteem.

Social Biases

2 min read

experimental Evidence


Self-Handicapping

The Psychology Behind It

Self-handicapping is a paradoxical behavior where people sabotage their own performance to protect their self-esteem. It involves creating impediments to success—such as procrastinating, not studying, or getting drunk the night before a big event—so that if they fail, they can blame the impediment rather than their own lack of ability.

If they succeed despite the handicap, their success is amplified ("I got an A without even studying!"). If they fail, the failure is externalized ("I failed because I didn't study," not "I failed because I'm not smart"). This strategy serves to maintain a positive self-concept, but at the cost of actual achievement.

Real-World Examples

Academic Procrastination

A student waits until the night before a final exam to start studying. If they get a bad grade, they can say, "Well, I only studied for two hours." If they get a good grade, they feel like a genius.

Sports Performance

An athlete might skip practice or fake a minor injury before a big game. This provides a built-in excuse for a poor performance and makes a good performance seem even more heroic.

Job Interviews

A candidate might stay up late partying the night before a crucial interview. If they don't get the job, they can blame the fatigue rather than facing the possibility that they weren't qualified.

Consequences

Self-handicapping can lead to:

  • Underachievement: By constantly creating obstacles, individuals prevent themselves from reaching their full potential.
  • Chronic Failure: The handicaps often cause the very failure the person fears.
  • Substance Abuse: Alcohol and drugs are common tools for self-handicapping.
  • Loss of Credibility: Over time, others may see through the excuses and view the person as unreliable.

How to Mitigate It

Overcoming self-handicapping requires building resilience and separating self-worth from performance.

  1. Separate Worth from Work: Understand that failing at a task does not make you a failure as a person.
  2. Visualize Success: Instead of focusing on the fear of failure, visualize yourself succeeding through preparation and effort.
  3. Self-Compassion: Treat yourself with kindness when you fail. This reduces the need for defensive strategies.
  4. Identify the Pattern: Notice when you are creating obstacles for yourself. Ask, "Am I doing this to have an excuse?"

Conclusion

Self-handicapping is a defense mechanism that backfires. It trades long-term success for short-term ego protection. By facing the fear of failure head-on, we can remove the self-imposed barriers to our own success.

Mitigation Strategies

Self-Compassion: Practice being kind to yourself in the face of failure. This reduces the threat to self-esteem that drives handicapping.

Effectiveness: high

Difficulty: moderate

Goal Setting: Set learning goals (mastering a skill) rather than performance goals (getting an A). Learning goals are less threatening.

Effectiveness: medium

Difficulty: moderate

Potential Decision Harms

Patients may delay seeking medical treatment to avoid the 'failure' of a bad diagnosis, leading to worse outcomes.

critical Severity

Professionals may sabotage their own promotion chances because they fear they won't be able to handle the new responsibilities.

major Severity

Key Research Studies

Drug choice as a self-handicapping strategy in response to noncontingent success

Berglas, S., & Jones, E. E. (1978) Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Demonstrated that people will choose a performance-inhibiting drug to protect their self-esteem after success they feel they didn't deserve.

Read Study →


Related Biases

Explore these related cognitive biases to deepen your understanding

Risky Shift

9 min read

Risky shift is the tendency for groups to make riskier decisions than individuals would make alone, especially when responsibility is diffused across members.

Social Biases / Group decision-making

/ Group Risk-Taking

Abilene Paradox

9 min read

The Abilene paradox is a group decision-making failure where people agree to a course of action that almost no one individually wants, because each assumes others are in favor.

Social Biases / Group decision-making

/ False consensus decision

Zero-Sum Bias

2 min read

Zero-sum bias is a cognitive bias towards thinking that a situation is a zero-sum game, where one person's gain would be another's loss.

Social Biases

/ Fixed pie bias

Correspondence Bias

9 min read

Correspondence bias is the tendency to infer stable personality traits from others' behavior while underestimating situational influences.

Social Biases / Attribution and impression formation

/ Fundamental Attribution Error

Trait Ascription Bias

8 min read

Trait ascription bias is the tendency to see others' behavior as reflecting fixed traits, while viewing our own behavior as more flexible and influenced by circumstances.

Social Biases / Self–other perception

/ Self–Other Asymmetry

Hostile Attribution Bias

9 min read

Hostile attribution bias is the tendency to interpret ambiguous actions of others as intentionally hostile or threatening.

Social Biases / Attribution and aggression

/ Hostile Attribution of Intent