Frequency Illusion

Also known as: Baader–Meinhof Phenomenon, Frequency Bias

The frequency illusion, sometimes called the Baader–Meinhof phenomenon, is a cognitive bias in which increased awareness of a word, idea, or object leads people to believe that it appears with greater frequency, even when its actual occurrence has not changed. This illusion is driven by selective attention and confirmation bias, which make matching instances more salient and memorable than before.

Cognitive Biases

/ Perception of frequency

8 min read

observational Evidence


Frequency Illusion: Why New Things Suddenly Seem to Be Everywhere

You learn a new word, notice a rare car model, or hear about a particular medical condition—and suddenly you seem to encounter it all the time. It feels as if the world has changed overnight. In reality, what has changed is your attention. This is the Frequency Illusion, also known as the Baader–Meinhof phenomenon.

The frequency illusion is the sense that something you have just noticed, learned, or thought about appears much more often than it did before, even though its actual frequency is likely unchanged. Once the idea enters your awareness, your brain starts spotting it more readily and remembering those instances, creating the impression of a spike.

The Psychology Behind It

Two key processes drive the frequency illusion:

  1. Selective Attention
    After encountering something for the first time (a word, product, concept), your brain tags it as relevant. Without conscious effort, you start noticing it more often amid the noise of everyday life. Instances that would have passed unnoticed now stand out.

  2. Confirmation Bias
    Once you have the sense that "this is showing up a lot," you begin to count examples that confirm this belief and ignore the many times it does not appear. Remembered matches outweigh forgotten non-matches.

These processes operate largely in System 1, which quickly spots patterns and reinforces impressions without rigorous statistical checking.

Real-World Examples

  • New Vocabulary: After learning a new word, you start hearing it in conversations, seeing it in articles, and spotting it in books, leading you to exclaim, "Everyone is using this word now!"

  • Car Models: After buying or considering a specific car model, you suddenly see it everywhere on the road, even though its prevalence hasn’t fundamentally changed.

  • Health Concerns: After reading about a symptom or condition, you notice others mentioning it and see it referenced in media more than before, making it feel like there is an outbreak or trend.

  • Technology and Products: After becoming aware of a new app or gadget, you spot ads and mentions for it frequently, partly because you are primed to notice them.

Consequences

The frequency illusion itself is often harmless, but it can have downstream effects:

  • Distorted Perceptions of Trends: People may believe that certain words, fashions, or problems have suddenly "exploded" based on their own heightened awareness.

  • Misperception of Risk or Prevalence: Increased noticing of a disease, crime, or behavior can make it seem more common, potentially fueling unnecessary anxiety or moral panic.

  • Reinforcement of Beliefs: If someone forms a belief and then starts noticing confirming instances more often, the illusion can strengthen their conviction that "this is happening everywhere."

How to Mitigate It

Mitigating the frequency illusion involves remembering that awareness is not the same as incidence:

  1. Ask for Data
    Before concluding that something has become more common, look for actual statistics or historical data rather than relying on impression.

  2. Recognize Attention Shifts
    Remind yourself: "This may feel more frequent simply because I’m paying more attention now."

  3. Consider Base Rates
    Think about how often you would expect to see the phenomenon given how much information you consume. A few sightings may not indicate a real trend.

  4. Be Cautious About Causal Stories
    Avoid spinning big narratives ("this is a new epidemic") based solely on your own increased noticing. Distinguish personal experience from population-level change.

Conclusion

The frequency illusion highlights how our minds can mistake shifts in attention for shifts in reality. Once we tune into something, we see it everywhere—not because it just appeared, but because we’re finally noticing it.

Being aware of this bias can help us stay grounded when new ideas, products, or concerns suddenly seem ubiquitous. Instead of trusting the feeling that "this is everywhere now," we can ask what has really changed: the world, or just what we’re paying attention to.

Common Triggers

Recent learning or first exposure

Emotional or personal relevance

Typical Contexts

Consumer decisions

Language and media consumption

Health and risk perception

Mitigation Strategies

Seek objective frequency information: Look for data or broader samples before concluding something is more common.

Effectiveness: medium

Difficulty: moderate

Potential Decision Harms

People may overestimate the prevalence of rare events and worry unnecessarily.

minor Severity


Related Biases

Explore these related cognitive biases to deepen your understanding

Loaded Language

Loaded language (also known as loaded terms or emotive language) is rhetoric used to influence an audience by using words and phrases with strong connotations.

Cognitive Biases

/ Emotive language

Euphemism

A euphemism is a mild or indirect word or expression substituted for one considered to be too harsh or blunt when referring to something unpleasant or embarrassing.

Cognitive Biases

/ Doublespeak (related)

Paradox of Choice

10 min read

The paradox of choice is the idea that having too many options can make decisions harder, reduce satisfaction, and even lead to decision paralysis.

Cognitive Biases / Choice and complexity

/ Choice Overload

Choice Overload Effect

10 min read

The choice overload effect occurs when having too many options makes it harder to decide, reduces satisfaction, or leads people to avoid choosing at all.

Cognitive Biases / Choice and complexity

/ Paradox of Choice

Procrastination

2 min read

Procrastination is the action of unnecessarily and voluntarily delaying or postponing something despite knowing that there will be negative consequences for doing so.

Cognitive Biases

/ Akrasia (weakness of will)

Time-Saving Bias

2 min read

The time-saving bias describes the tendency of people to misestimate the time that could be saved (or lost) when increasing (or decreasing) speed.

Cognitive Biases

/ Time-saving illusion