Anchoring Bias

Also known as: Anchoring Effect, Focalism, Anchor and Adjust Heuristic

Anchoring bias is a cognitive bias that causes people to rely disproportionately on the first piece of information they receive about a topic. Once an anchor is set, other judgments are made by adjusting away from that anchor, and there is a bias toward interpreting other information around the anchor.

Cognitive Biases

10 min read

experimental Evidence


Understanding Anchoring Bias

Anchoring bias is one of the most robust and well-documented cognitive biases in behavioral economics and psychology. First described by psychologists Amos Tversky and Daniel Kahneman in 1974, this bias demonstrates how initial information creates a mental reference point that disproportionately influences subsequent judgments and decisions.

The Mechanism

Anchoring works through a two-stage process:

Stage 1: The Anchor is Set

The first number, value, or piece of information you encounter becomes your reference point. This can happen:

  • Deliberately: A car salesman shows you the most expensive model first
  • Randomly: You see a number on a billboard before estimating a value
  • Unconsciously: You're exposed to information without realizing it affects you

Stage 2: Insufficient Adjustment

When making your own estimate or decision, you start from the anchor and adjust. However, research consistently shows that people don't adjust enough—they remain too close to the initial anchor, even when they know it's arbitrary or irrelevant.

Real-World Impact

Negotiations and Sales

Anchoring is perhaps most powerful in negotiations:

Salary Negotiations: The first number mentioned in a salary discussion typically becomes the anchor. If an employer offers $60,000 first, the final salary will likely be closer to that number than if the candidate had anchored at $80,000.

Real Estate: Listing prices serve as powerful anchors. A house listed at $500,000 will sell for more than the same house listed at $450,000, even if both are negotiable.

Retail Pricing: "Was $199, Now $99" uses the original price as an anchor to make the sale price seem more attractive.

Legal System

Anchoring affects even trained professionals:

Sentencing: Prosecutors' sentencing recommendations anchor judges' decisions. Higher recommended sentences lead to longer actual sentences.

Damages: Initial damage claims in lawsuits anchor jury awards, even when the claims are clearly inflated.

Medical Decisions

Doctors can be anchored by:

  • Initial diagnoses (making them less likely to consider alternatives)
  • First test results (affecting interpretation of subsequent tests)
  • Suggested treatment plans (influencing their own recommendations)

Everyday Decisions

Restaurant Menus: Expensive items at the top of the menu anchor expectations, making mid-priced items seem reasonable.

Charity Donations: Suggested donation amounts ($25, $50, $100) anchor how much people give.

Product Comparisons: Showing a premium option first makes standard options seem more affordable.

The Science Behind Anchoring

Classic Experiments

The Wheel of Fortune Study (Tversky & Kahneman, 1974):
Participants spun a wheel that landed on either 10 or 65. They were then asked to estimate the percentage of African nations in the UN. Those who saw 10 estimated around 25%, while those who saw 65 estimated around 45%. The random number anchored their estimates.

The Gandhi Study (Strack & Mussweiler, 1997):
Participants were asked: "Did Gandhi die before or after age 140?" vs. "Did Gandhi die before or after age 9?" The first group estimated he died around age 67, while the second estimated around age 50. Even absurd anchors had an effect.

Why It's So Powerful

Anchoring persists even when:

  1. You know about the bias: Awareness doesn't eliminate the effect
  2. The anchor is obviously wrong: Even absurd numbers influence estimates
  3. You're incentivized to be accurate: Monetary rewards don't eliminate anchoring
  4. You're an expert: Professionals are affected just like novices

Types of Anchoring

Numeric Anchoring

The most studied form—numbers influence numerical estimates.

Semantic Anchoring

Words and descriptions create anchors. "Luxury apartment" vs. "Affordable housing" anchors expectations about the same property.

Self-Generated Anchoring

You can anchor yourself by considering a value before making a decision.

Overcoming Anchoring Bias

While anchoring is difficult to eliminate, several strategies can reduce its impact:

1. Consider the Opposite

Before making a decision, deliberately consider why the anchor might be wrong. Ask: "What if the true value is much higher/lower?"

2. Delay Initial Judgments

Don't make snap decisions. Give yourself time to gather more information before forming an opinion.

3. Use Multiple Reference Points

Seek out several different estimates or values rather than relying on a single anchor.

4. Start from Your Own Estimate

In negotiations, make the first offer yourself to set a favorable anchor.

5. Question the Source

Ask: "Why was this particular number chosen?" Often, initial values are arbitrary or strategically selected.

6. Use Ranges Instead of Points

Think in ranges ("between $50-70") rather than single values ("$60").

Professional Applications

For Negotiators

  • Make the first offer to set a favorable anchor
  • Anchor high (but not absurdly so) when selling
  • Anchor low when buying
  • Prepare multiple anchors for different scenarios

For Decision Makers

  • Gather information independently before seeing others' estimates
  • Use structured decision processes that minimize early anchoring
  • Seek diverse perspectives to counter single anchors

For Consumers

  • Research prices independently before shopping
  • Ignore "original prices" in sales
  • Set your own budget before seeing options
  • Walk away if you feel anchored to an unreasonable price

Historical Impact

Anchoring has influenced major events:

Financial Markets: Initial IPO prices anchor investor expectations, affecting long-term valuations.

International Negotiations: First offers in treaty negotiations anchor final agreements.

Policy Decisions: Initial budget proposals anchor final spending levels.

The Research Continues

Recent studies have explored:

  • Cultural differences in anchoring susceptibility
  • Neural mechanisms underlying the bias
  • Effective debiasing techniques
  • Anchoring in digital environments (online shopping, apps)

Conclusion

Anchoring bias is a fundamental feature of human cognition that affects virtually every domain where we make estimates or judgments. Understanding how anchors work—and recognizing when you're being anchored—is crucial for making better decisions in negotiations, purchases, investments, and everyday life.

The key insight is that first impressions matter enormously. Whether you're buying a car, negotiating a salary, or estimating project timelines, the first number you encounter will likely have more influence than it should. By being aware of this bias and actively working to counter it, you can make more rational, independent decisions.

Common Triggers

First number mentioned in a negotiation

Seeing a price tag or suggested value

Initial estimates or forecasts

Arbitrary numbers in the environment

Typical Contexts

Salary and compensation negotiations

Real estate transactions

Retail shopping and pricing

Legal proceedings and settlements

Project estimation and planning

Investment decisions

Charitable giving

Performance evaluations

Budget planning

Mitigation Strategies

Make the first offer in negotiations

Effectiveness: high

Difficulty: easy

Delay initial judgments

Effectiveness: medium

Difficulty: easy

Consider multiple reference points

Effectiveness: high

Difficulty: moderate

Question the anchor's source and validity

Effectiveness: medium

Difficulty: easy

Use ranges instead of point estimates

Effectiveness: medium

Difficulty: moderate

Potential Decision Harms

Overpaying for goods, services, or assets due to high initial prices

major Severity

Accepting lower salaries or compensation due to low initial offers

major Severity

Unjust sentences or settlements influenced by arbitrary initial numbers

critical Severity

Poor project estimates leading to budget overruns or unrealistic timelines

major Severity

Key Research Studies

Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases

Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974) Science

Demonstrated that people make estimates by starting from an initial value and adjusting insufficiently, even when the anchor is arbitrary.

Read Study →

Numeric Judgments under Uncertainty: The Role of Knowledge in Anchoring

Strack, F., & Mussweiler, T. (1997) Journal of Experimental Social Psychology

Showed that even obviously wrong anchors (like asking if Gandhi died before or after age 140) still influence estimates.

Read Study →

Anchoring and Adjustment in Valuation

Northcraft, G. B., & Neale, M. A. (1987) American Economic Review

Demonstrated that even real estate experts are influenced by listing prices when valuing properties.

Read Study →

Further Reading

Thinking, Fast and Slow

by Daniel Kahneman • book

Nobel laureate's comprehensive exploration of cognitive biases including extensive discussion of anchoring.

Predictably Irrational

by Dan Ariely • book

Explores how anchoring and other biases affect economic decisions in everyday life.


Related Biases

Explore these related cognitive biases to deepen your understanding

Loaded Language

Loaded language (also known as loaded terms or emotive language) is rhetoric used to influence an audience by using words and phrases with strong connotations.

Cognitive Biases

/ Emotive language

Euphemism

A euphemism is a mild or indirect word or expression substituted for one considered to be too harsh or blunt when referring to something unpleasant or embarrassing.

Cognitive Biases

/ Doublespeak (related)

Paradox of Choice

10 min read

The paradox of choice is the idea that having too many options can make decisions harder, reduce satisfaction, and even lead to decision paralysis.

Cognitive Biases / Choice and complexity

/ Choice Overload

Choice Overload Effect

10 min read

The choice overload effect occurs when having too many options makes it harder to decide, reduces satisfaction, or leads people to avoid choosing at all.

Cognitive Biases / Choice and complexity

/ Paradox of Choice

Procrastination

2 min read

Procrastination is the action of unnecessarily and voluntarily delaying or postponing something despite knowing that there will be negative consequences for doing so.

Cognitive Biases

/ Akrasia (weakness of will)

Time-Saving Bias

2 min read

The time-saving bias describes the tendency of people to misestimate the time that could be saved (or lost) when increasing (or decreasing) speed.

Cognitive Biases

/ Time-saving illusion