Confirmation Bias

Also known as: Confirmatory Bias, Myside Bias, Verification Bias

Confirmation bias is a systematic error in thinking that affects the decisions and judgments people make. It occurs when individuals favor information that confirms their existing beliefs and ignore or dismiss information that contradicts them.

Cognitive Biases

8 min read

experimental Evidence


Understanding Confirmation Bias

Confirmation bias is one of the most pervasive and well-documented cognitive biases affecting human decision-making. First identified by psychologist Peter Wason in the 1960s, this bias influences how we gather information, remember events, and interpret ambiguous evidence.

The Mechanism

Confirmation bias operates through several psychological processes:

Selective Search

People actively seek out information that supports their existing beliefs. When researching a topic, individuals are more likely to click on articles with headlines that align with their views.

Biased Interpretation

Ambiguous information is interpreted in ways that support pre-existing beliefs. The same data can lead to opposite conclusions depending on prior beliefs.

Selective Recall

People remember information that confirms their beliefs more readily than contradictory information. This creates a self-reinforcing cycle where beliefs become stronger over time.

Real-World Impact

Confirmation bias affects virtually every domain of human activity:

Business and Investing

CEOs may ignore warning signs about failing products, focusing only on positive feedback. Investors hold losing stocks too long, seeking only information that supports their initial decision.

Healthcare

Doctors may focus on symptoms supporting their initial diagnosis while overlooking contradictory signs, potentially leading to misdiagnosis.

Politics and Social Issues

Voters consume media that reinforces their political views, creating echo chambers and increasing polarization.

Science and Research

Even trained scientists can fall prey to confirmation bias, designing experiments or interpreting data in ways that support their hypotheses.

Why It Happens

Several factors contribute to confirmation bias:

  1. Cognitive Efficiency: Our brains use shortcuts to process information quickly. Confirming existing beliefs is easier than revising them.

  2. Emotional Comfort: Challenging our beliefs creates cognitive dissonance, which is psychologically uncomfortable.

  3. Social Identity: Our beliefs often tie to our identity and social groups. Changing beliefs can feel like betraying our community.

  4. Overconfidence: We tend to be overconfident in our beliefs, making us less likely to seek disconfirming evidence.

Overcoming Confirmation Bias

While confirmation bias is deeply ingrained, several strategies can help:

Active Disconfirmation

Deliberately seek information that challenges your beliefs. Set a rule: for every confirming source, read one opposing viewpoint.

Pre-Commitment

Before making a decision, write down what evidence would change your mind. This creates accountability.

Devil's Advocate

Assign someone to argue against your position, or systematically argue against yourself.

Consider Alternatives

For every conclusion, generate 2-3 alternative explanations and evaluate them equally.

Blind Analysis

When possible, analyze data without knowing which hypothesis it supports.

Historical Examples

Confirmation bias has shaped major historical events:

  • Iraq War: Intelligence agencies focused on evidence of WMDs while dismissing contradictory information.
  • Financial Crisis 2008: Investors and regulators ignored warning signs, focusing on positive economic indicators.
  • Medical Errors: Numerous cases where doctors missed diagnoses by focusing on confirming evidence.

The Research

Extensive research has documented confirmation bias across cultures and contexts. Key studies include:

  • Wason's 2-4-6 task (1960): Demonstrated how people test hypotheses by seeking confirming evidence.
  • Lord, Ross & Lepper (1979): Showed how people with opposing views both found support in the same mixed evidence.
  • Nickerson (1998): Comprehensive review showing confirmation bias appears in multiple forms across reasoning domains.

Conclusion

Confirmation bias is a fundamental feature of human cognition, not a flaw to be eliminated. Understanding it is the first step toward making better decisions. By actively seeking disconfirming evidence and considering alternative viewpoints, we can reduce its impact on our judgments and choices.

Common Triggers

Strong pre-existing beliefs

Emotional investment

Information overload

Typical Contexts

Political debates and discussions

Scientific research and hypothesis testing

Medical diagnosis

Investment decisions

Hiring and personnel decisions

Legal proceedings and jury deliberations

Product development and market research

Mitigation Strategies

Actively seek disconfirming evidence

Effectiveness: high

Difficulty: moderate

Use pre-commitment devices

Effectiveness: high

Difficulty: easy

Employ devil's advocate

Effectiveness: medium

Difficulty: easy

Consider alternative hypotheses

Effectiveness: high

Difficulty: moderate

Potential Decision Harms

Failed products due to ignoring negative market signals

major Severity

Misdiagnosis and delayed treatment

critical Severity

Poor investment returns and financial losses

major Severity

Key Research Studies

Confirmation Bias: A Ubiquitous Phenomenon in Many Guises

Nickerson, R. S. (1998) Review of General Psychology

Confirmation bias appears in multiple forms across different domains of reasoning and decision-making.

Read Study →

Biased Assimilation and Attitude Polarization

Lord, C. G., Ross, L., & Lepper, M. R. (1979) Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

People with opposing views both found evidence supporting their existing views when presented with the same mixed evidence.

Read Study →


Related Biases

Explore these related cognitive biases to deepen your understanding

Loaded Language

Loaded language (also known as loaded terms or emotive language) is rhetoric used to influence an audience by using words and phrases with strong connotations.

Cognitive Biases

/ Emotive language

Euphemism

A euphemism is a mild or indirect word or expression substituted for one considered to be too harsh or blunt when referring to something unpleasant or embarrassing.

Cognitive Biases

/ Doublespeak (related)

Paradox of Choice

10 min read

The paradox of choice is the idea that having too many options can make decisions harder, reduce satisfaction, and even lead to decision paralysis.

Cognitive Biases / Choice and complexity

/ Choice Overload

Choice Overload Effect

10 min read

The choice overload effect occurs when having too many options makes it harder to decide, reduces satisfaction, or leads people to avoid choosing at all.

Cognitive Biases / Choice and complexity

/ Paradox of Choice

Procrastination

2 min read

Procrastination is the action of unnecessarily and voluntarily delaying or postponing something despite knowing that there will be negative consequences for doing so.

Cognitive Biases

/ Akrasia (weakness of will)

Time-Saving Bias

2 min read

The time-saving bias describes the tendency of people to misestimate the time that could be saved (or lost) when increasing (or decreasing) speed.

Cognitive Biases

/ Time-saving illusion